For agencies and freelancers, a quick, comprehensible overview counts: Which technical SEO problems are critical, which URLs are affected and what should be implemented first? Seitenreport delivers prioritized finds, sample URLs and exportable reports.
238 checks per URL · 126 checks website-wide
For SEO freelancers, web agencies, TYPO3, WordPress and shop agencies, consultants and project teams.
These situations deserve a targeted examination. Technical findings provide indications; content, professional accuracy and the actual request route must be additionally assessed.
Use the same check scope for initial calls and document the examined URLs. A comparison of free samples with different sized full crawls would not be a reliable evaluation of two customer websites.
Translate a finding into an editable task: affected template, sample URL, desired output, and follow-up audit. The business priority also results from the target page, demand and customer order.
Before and after the relaunch, compare status codes, forwarding goals, canonicals, and indexing rules of the same important URLs. A good overall score alone does not confirm a complete migration.
Separate in the customer report measured values, possible causes and already confirmed errors. Name the crawl scope and open controls so that a preview is not understood as a full audit.
The analysis combines technical crawl data, OnPage signals and structural clues. This does not create a loose pile of errors, but a prioritized action plan.
Example: /performances/seo redirects to the start page. The HTTP history is technically achievable, the technical target fit must still be evaluated.
Example: Reference detail pages contain two title elements, performance pages only one. Affected URLs help to narrow down the common layout cause.
Example: A canonical still refers to the test domain after the deployment. The visible reference can be checked; accesses to protected test environments are separate from it.
Example: A case study links to a remote performance. The crawl reports the unreachable destination if the source page and link are in the checked scope.
Example: Large thumbnails burden all project overviews. Technical cues can show the common pattern; actual perception on customer devices requires additional measurement.
The specific finds depend on your website. Typical anomalies can look like this, for example:
After a relaunch, internal links still point to old URL paths.
Critical 404 errors occur in navigation or footer links.
Meta data are several times identical after template rollout.
Simple individual checks usually only check an isolated aspect. Seitenreport crawls multiple pages, links technical signals and prioritizes the most important issues by impact. So you see not only what is noticeable, but also what you should fix first.
The most important questions before the first check.
Because agencies need structured initial checks, relaunch QA and prioritized finding for customer communication quickly.
Yes. Results are divisible via token URLs; for unlocked analyses, a PDF export is included.
White labels and individual reports are possible depending on the setup or add-on.
Yes. Status codes, redirects, internal links, canonicals and indexability are typical relaunch checkpoints.
Yes. For this, one-time unlocken, packages or individual setups are suitable.
You see the first abnormalities in a few minutes and then decide whether you want to unlock the full action plan.
Technical analysis gets stronger when combined with typical industry goals: customer reports, white label issues, and fast pre-examinations. Therefore, this page links directly to the audit trails, which for this target group most often turn audit finds into concrete tasks.
