Fix SEO errors – solve technical and structural problems in a targeted manner
Targeted correction and control of known SEO problems
If important pages do not rank, fall out of the index or technical SEO signals are contradictory, a list of errors alone is not enough. The aim is to find the actual causes cleanly, to prioritize them and to solve the relevant problems technically correctly.
- Personal care
- Agreed scope of services
Example order: Many individual messages come from a template
Illustrative process · no published customer case. The binding scope is agreed in advance.
What you bring
Confirmed findings with sample URLs and the responsible system environment.
What we are investigating
We reproduce the problem, seek the common cause, and consider intended exceptions before proposing a central change.
What you continue to work with
The agreed correction is checked on affected and unaffected page types; remaining open points are documented.
Performance limits
Not every tool warning is an error. New functional development and unagreed system parts are not implicitly included in the correction.
Typical SEO error images
- Pages are meant to be indexable, but incorrectly controlled by meta-robots, canonicals or redirects
- important URLs get internally too little relevance or are hardly meaningfully linked
- Template or CMS logic creates duplicates, parameter problems, or inconsistent signals
- Status codes, forwardings or head data are not technically cleanly implemented
For whom this makes sense
- Companies with a specific SEO or website problem
- Agencies with blocked customer projects
- In-house teams after relaunch, migration or CMS changes
- Websites with lots of finding but unclear prioritization
Not just symptoms
- not only tick off individual mistakes
- Identifying Systemic Causes Cleanly
- Define implementation logic for templates, components and page types
- Post-check important corrections
What SEO Mistakes We Typically Fix
The greatest damage is often not caused by a single error, but by contradictory signals in the interaction of templates, head data, indexing logic and internal linking.
Indexing and crawling
- noindex / robots / Canonical conflicts
- Erroneous XML sitemaps
- Non-indexed important pages
- Unwanted indexed search, filter or parameter pages
Forwarding and status codes
- false 301 / 302 logic
- Redirect chains and loops
- 404/410/soft 404 problems
- Inconsistent Target URLs
Meta, Head & Structure
- Erroneous or conflicting titles and descriptions
- Canonicals on Wrong Targets
- Heading and Page Type Structural Problems
- template-related onpage weaknesses
Internal linking
- Important pages are too weakly internally connected
- Orphan-like patterns
- Unclear link paths and priorities
- incorrect distribution of relevance signals
Template and CMS logic
- Duplicate-like page types
- Inconsistent side signals per template
- Systemic errors in modules or components
- Problems after releases or conversions
Relaunch episodes
- Loss of visibility after live play
- Old and New URL Structures Collide
- Mapping, redirect or canonical problems
- Suddenly altered indexing signals
What is included
- clean root cause analysis of the most important error patterns
- Prioritisation according to damage potential and feasibility
- Fix concept for website, templates, components or page types
- Direct correction or technical review of implementation
- Follow-up of the main corrections
What You Have in the End
- Clear classification instead of unsorted error list
- Action plan with justification and order
- technical clarity, what really needs to be solved first
- Optionally verified implementation or direct error correction
- Cleaner basis for rankings, crawling and indexing
Procedure for troubleshooting
Limiting error pattern
Collect the affected areas, page types and strongest signals cleanly.
Finding causes
Not only identify symptoms, but the actual technical or structural cause.
Prioritized Removal
Implement or accompany the most important corrections in a meaningful order.
Checks
Check whether the strongest error images have been cleanly cleaned technically.
Why Seitenreport
Seitenreport combines technical test data, real error patterns and practical implementation logic. This does not remain with an audit or a pure evaluation, but leads to concrete improvements to the website.
This is especially valuable for grown websites, relaunch episodes, CMS setups and projects where many problems are related.
The free analysis and SEO tools are a good place to start. The service is about classification, prioritization, action logic and – depending on the project – direct technical correction or review of the implementation.
Depicting the SEO Problem
Briefly describe starting position, affected URLs or page types, CMS/Setup and destination. In this way, it is possible to quickly assess whether direct remediation, upstream analysis, technical review or ongoing support makes more sense.
What you can do concretely
- Defined work package of confirmed findings
- Implementation of the agreed corrections in the appropriate system
- Documentation and follow-up audit of the changed signals
In advance, we agree on the specific changes, required accesses and criteria for the follow-up audit. Additional tasks can be assigned separately.
What we vote before the start
Feasibility, accesses and tasks are checked in advance. Larger works or further sprints receive their own offer; no unlimited repair promise.
FAQ
What SEO Mistakes Are You Typically Fixing? +
For example, indexing errors, canonical and robots issues, faulty redirects, status code issues, internal linking, meta data, heading structures, and template-related SEO weaknesses.
Does this also make sense after relaunches or CMS changes? +
Yes. Especially after relaunches, migrations, template changes or technical deployments, SEO damage often arises, which must not only be made visible, but also be corrected in a targeted manner.
Do you only fix individual errors or the causes? +
The goal is not only to resolve individual symptoms. It is more important to find the technical or structural cause clean – such as template logic, internal link patterns, redirect rules or systemic CMS problems.
Do you work with agencies? +
Yes. Troubleshooting can be done directly, as white label support, as a technical review or as implementation support with agencies, developers and in-house teams.
Is an audit always necessary first? +
Not mandatory. If the problem is already concretely limited, you can go directly into analysis and correction. In the case of unclear or systemic problems, a prior error analysis usually makes sense.
What information should I send in the request? +
Helpful are: affected problem or target, example URLs, CMS or shop system, time of changes, already known audit or search console signals and the desired time window.
Your personal contact: Matthias Gläßner
Senior web developer with SEO focus · Founder and owner of Seitenreport · TYPO3 lecturer at GFU
18+ years of experience: Matthias Gläßner has been supporting companies, agencies, associations and public agencies in web projects since 2007. His focus is on technical SEO, performance, web architecture and the further development of grown websites.
You discuss your task directly with the responsible contact person. Technical test data, personal classification and coordinated priorities form the basis of the cooperation.
Non-binding requests
Briefly describe your plans. Matthias Gläßner will contact you personally.
Price limits: from 1,490 € per Sprint plus VAT