Law firm websites must quickly make it clear which areas of law are offered, where the law firm is located and how to contact clients. Seitenreport finds technical SEO errors, OnPage problems and structural anomalies with clear prioritization.
238 checks per URL · 126 checks website-wide
For lawyers, specialist lawyers, law firms, notaries and legal advice offers with their own website.
These situations deserve a targeted examination. Technical findings provide indications; content, professional accuracy and the actual request route must be additionally assessed.
One side on labour law needs different questions and benefits than one side on inheritance law. The same texts with an exchanged field of law hardly help clients; technical test values do not replace a technical content test.
Legal fields, competent lawyers and contact channels should be connected via normal links. A specialist page that can only be reached via search or the sitemap is difficult for visitors to the law firm website to discover.
Clearly assign address, contact person and contact route to the respective office location. Check the details manually, especially if several branches use the same page template.
After a change in the legal structure, specialist articles can point to old performance URLs. Update important internal references directly to the new destination and treat deleted content after its actual replacement.
The analysis combines technical crawl data, OnPage signals and structural clues. This does not create a loose pile of errors, but a prioritized action plan.
Example: Labour law and inheritance law have the same page title. The audit recognizes the repetition; suitable legal descriptions are editorially responsible.
Example: A new location page accidentally remains on noindex. The recognition applies to the delivered response and does not yet occupy any actual Google indexing.
Example: An earlier guide path provides 404, although there is a content follow-up page. The meaningful forwarding destination is determined based on the content.
Example: A jurisdiction page points to a deleted team URL. The technical error is verifiable; responsibilities and professional information require personal examination.
Example: The JSON-LD has an old phone number. Recognized company data supports the comparison, but does not replace legal verification of imprint and mandatory information.
The specific finds depend on your website. Typical anomalies can look like this, for example:
Several jurisdiction pages use nearly identical meta-data.
An internal link points to a no longer existing consulting page.
Canonical signals are inconsistent on article and performance pages.
Simple individual checks usually only check an isolated aspect. Seitenreport crawls multiple pages, links technical signals and prioritizes the most important issues by impact. So you see not only what is noticeable, but also what you should fix first.
The most important questions before the first check.
Because areas of expertise, local search, trust and a clear page structure have to work together.
Technical accessibility, indexability, internal links, meta data, canonicals, specialist pages and typical OnPage anomalies.
No, but it provides a structured technical basis and prioritized to-dos for implementation.
Yes. Especially smaller websites benefit from clear technical quick wins.
For enabled analyses, the PDF export is included.
You see the first abnormalities in a few minutes and then decide whether you want to unlock the full action plan.
Technical analysis becomes stronger when combined with typical industry objectives: specialist pages, local visibility and trust signals. Therefore, this page links directly to the audit trails, which for this target group most often turn audit finds into concrete tasks.
